The University City Historical Society has applied to the city’s Historical Commission for protection of a cluster of 41 Victorian homes near Clark Park on Chester Avenue and Regent Streets.
Well-known 19th century architect Willis G. Hale designed the homes, which include the mansion known as “The Gables” (now a bed and breakfast) and nearby twins on the 4500 block of Chester Avenue and twins and row homes on both sides of the 4500 block of Regent Street. Collectively, the properties would form the “Chester-Regent Historic District.”
Designation as one of the city’s approximately two dozen Historic Districts would provide some protection against demolition, require homeowners to retain historic qualities of their homes when they renovate or repair them and that nearby new construction take into account the historic qualities of the existing buildings.
“New development in West Philadelphia has dramatically accelerated in recent years, often resulting in the demolition of historic neighborhood assets to make way for larger and less architecturally interesting structures,” a University City Historical Society statement reads. “The nomination of the Chester-Regent Historic District will preserve one of West Philadelphia’s most treasured blocks for generations to come.”
Many homeowners and preservationists have focused renewed attention on historic district designation in recent years. Residents on the 400 block of South 42nd Street won designation in 2017 for a collection of Victorian row homes know collectively as “420 Row.” It was the first district designation since 2010.
The Historical Commission is scheduled to consider the application at a meeting of the Committee for Historical Designation on April 17 and then, if things go well there, at the full Commission on May 10. Both meetings begin at 9:30 a.m. in room 18-029 on the 18th floor of 1515 Arch St.
March 4th, 2019 at 11:41 pm
Did the home owners agree to this?
March 5th, 2019 at 10:35 am
would love to see a lawyer weigh in here. is this an infringement upon private property rights? or as Mike said, did homeowners consent? is this a permanent deed restriction type exercise?
i am all for preserving these beautiful homes. just would be a waste of time/money if the courts deem the historical distinction illegal
March 5th, 2019 at 11:00 am
i’m a homeowner in this proposed district, and i can confirm that a very large majority of us were in favor of seeking the historical designation. (although, for good reason, property owners’ approval is not a pre-requisite.)
March 7th, 2019 at 11:52 am
Received the notice and was surprised to see the scope of approvals required. A few folks were asking around a few streets to see who was interested in this. Seems like a lot of people liked the designation. We will see how much they like their home improvement being scrutinized. Potentially.
March 7th, 2019 at 9:15 pm
I can’t help but notice that some of you questioning the historic designation live in the suburbs.
March 8th, 2019 at 3:43 pm
There is only 5 comments including yours so who is in the suburbs? I am in this district an dit is my prime residence.